CVE-2026-52946
HIGHCVSS v3.1: 7.5 · EPSS: 0.0053 (40.8 percentile)
Source data as of:
At a glance
- Severity
- HIGH
- CVSS
- 7.5 v3.1 · NVD
- EPSS
- 0.0053 (40.8 percentile) · FIRST.org
- CISA KEV
- No
- Attack conditions (CVSS vector)
- NetworkNo privilegesNo user interaction · Source: NVD Vector
- Published
- 2026-06-24 · Modified: 2026-06-28
- References
- Jump to references (8)
CVSS / EPSS / KEV
Source — CVSS: NVD · EPSS: FIRST.org · KEV: CISA. Data & Sources
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling A SOFTIRQ-safe to SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order deadlock can occur in send_sigio() and send_sigurg() when a process group receives a signal. When FASYNC is configured for a process group (PIDTYPE_PGID), both functions use read_lock(&tasklist_lock) to traverse the task list. However, they are frequently called from softirq context: - send_sigio() via input_inject_event -> kill_fasync - send_sigurg() via tcp_check_urg -> sk_send_sigurg (NET_RX_SOFTIRQ) The deadlock is caused by the rwlock writer fairness mechanism: 1. CPU 0 (process context) holds read_lock(&tasklist_lock) in do_wait(). 2. CPU 1 (process context) attempts write_lock(&tasklist_lock) in fork() or exit() and spins, which blocks all new readers. 3. CPU 0 is interrupted by a softirq (e.g., TCP URG packet reception). 4. The softirq calls send_sigurg() and attempts to acquire read_lock(&tasklist_lock), deadlocking because CPU 1 is waiting. Since PID hashing and do_each_pid_task() traversals are already RCU-protected, the read_lock on tasklist_lock is no longer strictly required for safe traversal. Fix this by replacing tasklist_lock with rcu_read_lock(), aligning the process group signaling path with the single-PID path. This also mitigates a potential remote denial of service vector via TCP URG packets. Lockdep splat: ===================================================== WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected [...] Chain exists of: &dev->event_lock --> &f_owner->lock --> tasklist_lock Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(tasklist_lock); local_irq_disable(); lock(&dev->event_lock); lock(&f_owner->lock); <Interrupt> lock(&dev->event_lock); *** DEADLOCK ***
References
Reference URLs as listed by NVD, grouped by a mechanical match on the link's host/pattern. Labels describe the link type only.
- Reference https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1bee417678f1135e35b25a37734db46aa94258d2
- Reference https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/20a93e397abe850c49b6fa0e8cc827b5f634a8f5
- Reference https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/32dbd5ce4be3a3ed7e00f8af18795cc84fc50a33
- Reference https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/36c1b57b2ecf3c61ac93f5f07bd29b6f21e226ed
- Reference https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/54626335ea4174ab2d9a183b511d825f6765e47b
- Reference https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/897d6a7247739fb1528f98c575df4f2e5de7f994
- Reference https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b5fa9e32fb6718f70c986ee14dd5d01b4846f331
- Reference https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bfcc8e8d8a495bb34cae9e620adfb75fb13a3954